What step follows the formation of a conclusion if the hypothesis is found to be incorrect?

When a hypothesis is found to be incorrect, the logical next step in the scientific process is to formulate a new hypothesis. This process is essential because it allows scientists to refine their understanding of the phenomenon being studied. By creating a new hypothesis, they can develop alternative explanations or models that may better explain the observed data and align with the results of their investigations.

Formulating a new hypothesis is a critical part of the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where each conclusion leads to more questions and further exploration. This helps drive scientific progress, as researchers are constantly updating their understanding based on new evidence. This practice fosters a deeper exploration of the subject matter, ultimately leading to a more robust and comprehensive understanding of the scientific principles at play.